Legal Opinion

Field v. Walton

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1928No. Docket No. 4808PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETCH, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment allowing but single damages in an action for unlawful detainer.

According to the allegations of the complaint the. plaintiff leased to the defendant certain premises situated in the city of Santa Barbara for a term of five years, the lease expiring May 31, 1924. On April 21st, or a month prior to such expiration, the plaintiff notified the defendant in writing that she would require possession of the premises upon the termination of the lease. Defendant, however, failed to surrender possession on May 31st, and suit was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. San Francisco & Suburban Home Building Society v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. Waldock v. First Nat. Bank of IdabelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Alden v. MayfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Orly v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Richard v. Degen & Brody, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Buck v. MorrossisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Gwinn v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Knight v. Fox Caldwell Theatres CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API