Vatuone v. Cannobio
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. R. Welch, Judge. The facts are stated in the. opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
This is a proceeding in unlawful detainer to recover possession of the premises described in the complaint, together with damages for the withholding thereof. Plaintiff recovered judgment, and defendants prosecute this appeal from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial.
The facts are in substance as follows: Plaintiff, by written lease, dated November 1, 1901, let the premises to De Carley and Searsi for three years, the lease to end November 1, 1904, for the rent of $100 per month for the first six months, and $120 per month for the remainder of the term. After…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heilbron v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Commissioners to Manage Yosemite Valley & Mariposa Big Tree Grove v. BarnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Brandt v. PhillippiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Craig v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gwinn v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Board of Public Service Commissioners v. SpearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hancock Oil Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hancock Oil Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944