Druck v. Antrim Lime Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Emmet; Shepherd, J. Case by William F. Druck against the Antrim Lime Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This case is before us for the second time. When first here it will be found reported in 167 Mich. 154 (132 N. W. 492), where there will be found a full statement of the case. A comparison of the two records will show that there is no material difference in the testimony adduced upon the two trials, and it is not deemed necessary to restate the case. Upon the first trial the circuit judge directed a verdict and judgment for the defendant, upon the ground of assumption of risk by the plaintiff. In reversing the case, we said:
“The most favorable statement for the defendant that can be made from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fike v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Gardiner v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Stevens v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Tousignant v. Shafer Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Druck v. Antrim Lime Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- McGavock v. DucharmeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Gumtow v. JankeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Pachuczynski v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Simmer v. Cutter's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.