Legal Opinion

Fike v. Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1913No. Docket No. 49PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Error to Bay; Collins, J. Case by Mary Pike against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case arises out of injuries sustained by the plaintiff in a collision between a wagon and team, driven by her husband, in which she was riding, and a passenger train of the defendant company, known as train No. 420, at the intersection of McKinley avenue, or Eighth street, and Jefferson street, in the city of Bay City, on the 10th day of July, 1911. The place and sur*169roundings involved, and referred to in the testimony, are shown on the blueprint appended to the record.

The claim of the plaintiff is substantially as follows: That on the day named she was riding in a wagon drawn by two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donohue v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co. v. MannIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Battishill v. HumphreysMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Labarge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Gardiner v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Dedes v. AschMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. LaCroix v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Sun Oil Company v. SeamonMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Holsaple v. Menominee Sup'ts of PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API