Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Rose

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Oakland. (Stiekney, J.) Action on. the case for .waste. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought under chapter 271, How. Stat., entitled “Of Waste.”

Section 1 of that chapter provides:

“If any guardian, or any tenant by the courtesy, tenant in dower, or for term of life or years, or the assigns of any such tenant, shall commit or suffer any waste during their several terms or estates, of the houses, gardens, orchards, lands or woods, or of any other thing belonging to the tenements-so held, without having a lawful license in writing so to do, they shall respectively be liable to an action on the case for such waste.”

In April, 1870, the defendant was the owner of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. BedellMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Adams v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Morrison v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Van Slyck v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Ferris v. QuimbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Druck v. Antrim Lime Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Derham v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. James Leo Co. v. Jersey City Bill Posting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  4. Joslin v. LinderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Duncombe v. FeltMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API