Legal Opinion

Gardiner v. Courtright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1911No. Docket No. 137PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error to Newaygo; Sessions, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Minnie Gardiner against William Court-right for services performed. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action of assumpsit in which the plaintiff seeks to recover for services performed by her for the defendant during a period of a little more than 25 years, from November, 1883, to March 8, 1909.

*55It is not disputed that the plaintiff worked for, and was in the employ of, and performed services for, the defendant during the period above stated, and that said services were not gratuitous; or, in other words, it is conceded that they were performed under an agreement and understanding that she should be compensated therefor

It was the claim of the plaintiff at the trial, and she…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hintz v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hoffman v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Pelton v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Spray v. AyotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Strand v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Fike v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Jones v. Eastern Michigan MotorbusesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Grossman v. LangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. People v. SartoriMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Goonen v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API