Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair; Tappan, J. Assumpsit by Morris M. Silverstone against the London Assurance Corporation and other defendants named in the title, by separate actions which were consolidated by stipulation. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
These cases had the consideration of this court in an opinion written by Mr. Justice Stone, reported in 176 Mich. 525 (142 N. W. 776). Having *335been reversed, on the new trial the jury again found in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount claimed. An examination of this opinion will disclose the claims of the parties. On the new trial, as on the trial before, the testimony was very voluminous.
In the brief of counsel, in support of the contention that the verdict was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, considerable reliance is placed upon the proposition that the plaintiff, in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fike v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Tubbs v. Dwelling-House InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Gardiner v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Farrell v. HazeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Socha v. PassinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Winekoff v. PospisilMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. OnestoMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Rushing v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jewell v. Rogers TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.