Tousignant v. Shafer Iron Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Iron. (Stone, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Plaintiff sues in behalf of himself and some 40 others to recover for labor performed in mining at the Shafer iron mine in June, July, and August, 1891, and for certain board furnished the men, as hereinafter explained.
Defendant began operating the mine in 1889, and continued the mining operations until January 1, 1891, when it let the contract to take out the ore to one Jennings, who had up to that time been its superintendent, and from that time forward Jennings carried on the business of get*89■ting out the ore in his own behalf, and paid the menfor the months of January to April, both…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claflin v. . LenheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Ketcham v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Uhl v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Ulrich v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Lyon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Druck v. Antrim Lime Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Avery v. BurrallMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Benson v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- LaFond v. RumlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Edwards v. Wheeler's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902