Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Holston
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 25, 1993No. 799 Disciplinary Docket 2PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PAPADAKOS, Justice.
This Court, in response to the Report and Recommendations filed in this matter on December 19, 1990, by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Board) issued a Rule to Show Cause why Gregory G. Holston (Respondent) should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth. Briefs were filed in this matter by the Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and the parties were afforded the opportunity to argue orally before this Court. Our review of the entire record submitted to us by the Board, and the briefs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re OxmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SurrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Capital Care Corp. v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ValentinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- In re MelograneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.