Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Chung
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NEWMAN, Justice.
Respondent Daniel W. Chung has filed exceptions to the Disciplinary Board’s report recommending his disbarment.
On August 24, 1994, this Court temporarily suspended Respondent from practice based on his July 15, 1993 guilty plea in federal court on five counts of making false statements to a federally insured financial institution1. Because of his convictions, the District Court imposed concurrent sentences of twelve months and one day for each count and ordered Respondent to pay restitution in the amount of $106,000.00, along with a fine and assessment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RaifordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
3Cited by28 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KiesewetterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MonsourSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ValentinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- In re MelograneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.