Legal Opinion

Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1975No. 295 Misc.Dkt. 20PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JONES, Chief Judge.

Respondent, John W. Campbell, Jr., has practiced law for twenty years. In December 1971 he undertook to represent Charlene Mcllwaine, who was then under federal indictment for possessing approximately thirty pounds of marijuana. Immediately upon accepting her case, respondent received from her a retainer of $1,000.

During the course of his representation respondent informed his client that he could for a price “fix” her case as he had done previously in other criminal matters. He sought and received over $4,000 to allegedly arrange the suppression of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. In the Matter of SaabMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API