Legal Opinion

In re Melograne

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2005PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NEWMAN.

Petitioner, Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) requests that this Court disbar Respondent, Julius C. Melograne (Melo-grane), contrary to the recommendation of the majority of the Disciplinary Board, which would impose a suspension for a period of five years. For the reasons set forth herein, we order the disbarment of Melograne.

Facts and Procedural History

Melograne was admitted to the bar in 1969 and began serving as the district justice for the Magisterial District 05-2-17 on January 5, 1970. He served in that capacity until August 16, 1993, when he was placed on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re MatteraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EilbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. In Re MelograneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChristieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. In Re BerkhimerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. In re RocaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. In re SegalCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PozonskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API