Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Valentino
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
This disciplinary matter arises from a Petition for Discipline charging Respondent, Philip Valentino, Jr., with a violation of Pa.R.D.E. 203(b)(1), based upon his conviction of one count of mail fraud,18 U.S.C. § 1341. The Disciplinary Board has recommended that Respondent be disbarred. Upon independent review of the circumstances surrounding Respondent’s conviction, we hold that the appropriate sanction for his misconduct is a five-year suspension, retroactive to the date of temporary suspension.
The record establishes that between 1987 and 1996, Respondent and Dr.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EilbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChristieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re MelograneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- In Re IuloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re IuloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In re Anonymous No. 77 D.B. 97Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.