Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Valentino

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1999PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This disciplinary matter arises from a Petition for Discipline charging Respondent, Philip Valentino, Jr., with a violation of Pa.R.D.E. 203(b)(1), based upon his conviction of one count of mail fraud,18 U.S.C. § 1341. The Disciplinary Board has recommended that Respondent be disbarred. Upon independent review of the circumstances surrounding Respondent’s conviction, we hold that the appropriate sanction for his misconduct is a five-year suspension, retroactive to the date of temporary suspension.

The record establishes that between 1987 and 1996, Respondent and Dr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EilbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChristieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re MelograneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. In Re IuloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. In Re IuloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. In re Anonymous No. 77 D.B. 97Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API