Legal Opinion
In Re Oxman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 17, 1981No. 515PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAUFFMAN, Justice.
Harry J. Oxman and Ralph S. Levitan appeal from orders of the Special Disciplinary Court of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia suspending them from the practice of law for one and one-half years and one year respectively for 29 violations of the Canons of Ethics and the Code of Professional Responsibility. 1 Because we conclude that the findings of fact are adequately supported by the record, and because those facts forcefully establish that appellants are unworthy of the public trust and confidence vested in them as members of the legal profession, we affirm…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Matter of WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.