Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stern
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 3, 1987No. 551 Disciplinary Docket, 2PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*70OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
This Court, in response to the Report and Recommendation filed in this matter by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (“Board”), has issued a Rule to Show Cause why Respondent, Peter M. Stern, should not be disbarred from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Having considered the pleadings and briefs filed by Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, having heard oral argument, and after a full review of the record submitted by the Board, we are constrained to conclude that the Rule to Show Cause must be made…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Benson v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CostiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChristieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ShorallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.