Legal Opinion
Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1970No. L. A. 29659PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
In this action for relief based upon the rescission of a franchise contract, defendant appeals from a judgment determining that the contract had been rescinded and ordering restitution and consequential damages in favor of plaintiff.
Defendant Pacific Air Industries, Inc. (Pacific) is a corporation engaged in the business of aerial surveying and photogrammetric services with headquarters in Long Beach. In 1965 plaintiff was, and for several years prior thereto had been, a geologist and engineer employed by Tidewater Oil Company (Tidewater). In October of that year he…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Paularena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Peterson v. Highland Music, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- People Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Beaumont Investment, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- H. Russell Taylor's Fire Prevention Service, Inc. v. Coca Cola Bottling Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- St. Regis Paper Company v. Royal Industries, and Plas-Ties Subsidiary, St. Regis Paper Company v. Royal Industries, and Plas-Ties SubsidiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.