Anderson v. Thacher
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Separate appeals are prosecuted by defendants from a judgment entered against them jointly in the sum of $40,000 after trial before the court sitting without a jury. The action was one to recover secret profits in connection with the exchange of certain real properties.
Insofar as the evidence may be conflicting, it is axiomatic that on appeal we must consider the evidence most favorably to respondent. In accordance with that rule, we feel justified in making the following statement of facts, although as to some of them there was a sharp conflict in the evidence.
During the summer of 1937,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Rutherford v. Rideout BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Doctors' Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.