Ferguson v. Koch
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, J., pro tem.
Action to recover the purchase price of a certain used autotruck sold under a written agreement. Defendant by his answer admitted the sale, but by way of defense alleged that he was induced to make the purchase by means of fraudulent representations. Judgment was rendered for defendant and plaintiff appeals. The facts, briefly stated, are as follows: On the fourteenth day of December, 1925, plaintiff was the owner of a 1916 year model Reo automobile, which he had commenced to convert into a light delivery truck. Defendant, a contractor, after examining the same, entered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Sullivan v. HelbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Fritz v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Mooney v. CyriacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Gagnon v. St. Maries Light & Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc. v. Fresno-Madera Production Credit Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.