Zalkind v. Ceradyne, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.—
Introduction
Ceradyne, Inc. (Ceradyne), entered into an asset purchase agreement (Asset Purchase Agreement) with Stanley Zalkind and Elizabeth Zalkind (the Zalkinds) and Quest Technology, LP (Quest), a limited partnership owned by the Zalkinds. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Ceradyne *1017purchased all of Quest’s assets for a price of $2.44 million, of which $300,000 was paid in cash and the remainder paid with unregistered shares of Ceradyne stock.
The Zalkinds and Quest later sued Ceradyne, asserting a single cause of action for breach of contract. The Zalkinds…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Alki Partners, LP v. DB Fund Services, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- McWilliams v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Agence France Presse v. MorelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.