Legal Opinion

Robison v. Katz

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1980No. 3665PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LOPEZ, Judge.

This ease arises out of a real estate transaction which the vendee claims she was induced to enter by the fraudulent misrepresentations of the principal vendor and the real estate broker. The issues we consider in this appeal are: 1. whether rescission of a contract may be granted when the defrauded party is unable to restore the other party to the status quo ante ; 2. whether a party who obtains rescission is also entitled to consequential damages; 3. whether punitive damages are proper in the circumstances of this case; 4. whether a party' who failed to object below can…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bank of New Mexico v. RiceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Prudential Insurance Company of America v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Maxey v. QuintanaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. McMullen v. KutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Catherine B. Ramsey v. Charles H. Culpepper and the Farmington Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Ledbetter v. WebbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hood v. FulkersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API