Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tausend v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 5, 1927No. 2954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The merchandise imported in the case now before us was classified as Jacquard woven upholstery cloths under paragraph 909 of the Tariff Act of 1922. It was claimed in the protest to be dutiable under paragraph 921 of said act as articles made of cotton cloth and manufactures of cotton. A further claim was made under paragraph 912 of said act, but. this claim is not insisted upon in this court and will be treated as abandoned. The court below, after granting a rehearing, overruled the several protests involved and the importer has appealed.

The pertinent paragraphs are as follows:

909.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. United States v. Chesterton Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. J. M. Rodgers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. United States v. Great Pacific Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  4. United States v. BrandensteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. Kyer & Cashel Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API