Legal Opinion

J. M. Rodgers Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 16, 1967No. C.D. 3084PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

Plaintiff, having pursued and been denied administrative relief, in effect protests the administrative finding that black vinyl raincoats, imported from Japan, are manufactures of a product consisting of calcium carbonate filler bound together with synthetic resin or a resin-like substance. The Bureau ruling confirmed the collector’s liquidation, classifying the raincoats under paragraph 1539(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), as manufactures wholly or in chief value of a product of which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Edson Keith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. Krusi v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. S. S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. Jomac-North, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Tausend v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tomoegawa USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. Dollar Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Abbey Rents v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  4. J. M. Rodgers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Rollix Bearing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API