United States v. Brandenstein
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
These are cross-appeals from a judgment of the United States Customs Court.
Milled rice, consisting of both whole and broken grains, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of San Francisco at 2 cents per pound under paragraph 727 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:
Par. 727. Paddy or rough rice, 1 cent per pound; brown rice (hulls removed), IK cents per pound; milled rice (bran removed), 2 cents per pound; broken rice, and rice meal, flour, polish, and bran, one-half of 1 cent per pound. [Italics ours.]
The importer objected to the collector’s assessment, claiming…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rice Millers' Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Washburn-Crosby Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Tausend v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Winter-Wolff, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Timber Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008