Legal Opinion

United States v. Brandenstein

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 19, 1930No. 3276; No. 3277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

These are cross-appeals from a judgment of the United States Customs Court.

Milled rice, consisting of both whole and broken grains, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of San Francisco at 2 cents per pound under paragraph 727 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Par. 727. Paddy or rough rice, 1 cent per pound; brown rice (hulls removed), IK cents per pound; milled rice (bran removed), 2 cents per pound; broken rice, and rice meal, flour, polish, and bran, one-half of 1 cent per pound. [Italics ours.]

The importer objected to the collector’s assessment, claiming…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice Millers' Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Washburn-Crosby Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Tausend v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Winter-Wolff, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  2. Timber Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API