United States v. Massin
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
The matter now before us is an appeal from the judgment of the-court below, in the reappraisement of certain black silk hatters’ plush, imported by the appellee. Divers goods were imported and invoiced, but, by abandonment and stipulation, the issues are-narrowed down to the consideration of but one item, namely, quality No. 2522. The local appraiser fixed the value of this material at the-invoice value, namely, 2.18 gold marks per yard for the plush about 18 inches in width and at 3.50 gold marks for that 26 to 26 inches in width. The Government appealed to reappraisement and Chief Justice…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greenleaf v. GoodrichSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Schmieder v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Monticelli Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- United States v. WeckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Scharf Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Markell v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- United States v. Japan Import Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
- Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.