Legal Opinion

Carter v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 21, 1915No. 1520PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7685 (T. D. 35139).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

This case presents two issues. The merchandise involved consists of nettings, which are all Jacquard figured. There is one class of goods, numbered 35135, which a preponderance of evidence shows to be goods the predominating use of which is for curtains. The case involves a construction of that portion of paragraph 258 of the tariff act of 1913 which provides for “ tapestries, and other Jacquard figured upholstery goods, composed wholly or in chief value of cotton or other vegetable fiber,” as in contrast with nets and nettings in paragraph 358 of the same act. This for the purpose of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fink v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Meyer v. CadwaladerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  4. Bing & Co.'s Successors v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. United States v. Elgin National Watch Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. United States v. Mills & GibbCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Sardik, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  4. Tausend v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API