Legal Opinion

United States v. Post Fish Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 23, 1925No. 2523PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The merchandise imported in this case consists of fish roe for food purposes. It was classified for duty by the collector at 30 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 721, Tariff Act of 1922. The importer protested, claiming the same to be free under paragraph 1569 as eggs, or, in the alternative, dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1459 of said act, as raw or unmanufactured articles not enumerated.

The court below sustained the protest and held the goods free under said paragraph 1569. From this judgment the Government appeals, insisting the collector’s classification should…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. ConkeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Schoenemann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
  3. Strauss & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Isler v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  5. Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Scharf Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Rice Millers' Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Allied Food Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. Magnesium Elektron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API