Legal Opinion
In Re Pearson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 15, 1993No. 91-SP-565PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*95REILLY, Senior Judge:
Having been notified that respondent, Pearson, recently disbarred from practice in Maryland by the Court of Appeals of that state, is also a member of the bar of this jurisdiction, the Board on Professional Responsibility, after reviewing the Maryland proceedings has recommended that our court should order him disbarred in the District of Columbia — a recommendation also supported in a statement to the Board by Bar Counsel. As the ground for disbarment had nothing to do with any act which occurred in the District, our disposition of such recommendation is governed by D.C.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of SinclairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re ShearinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re Liang-Houh ShiehDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re HitselbergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.