Legal Opinion
In Re Godette
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 2007No. 05-BG-412PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Senior Judge:
In a Report and Recommendation issued on May 2, 2005, the Board on Professional Responsibility (BPR or the Board) found by clear and convincing evidence that Brian 0. Godette, a member of our Bar, violated Rule 8.1(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct (failure to respond reasonably to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority), Rule 8.4(d) (serious interference with the administration of justice), and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2(b)(3) (failure to comply with an order of the BPR). The Board recommended that Godette be suspended from practice for thirty days…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of MacHinists v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Child Labor Tax CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Andrews v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re LeaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re SilvaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.