Legal Opinion
Weber v. National Football League
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 31, 2000No. 3:99CV7790PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is a ease in which plaintiff alleges that defendants violated provisions of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-2, the common law, and Ohio statutory law, and seeks declaratory judgment under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-02. Specifically, plaintiff claims that defendants conspired to abuse their rights as trademark holders and otherwise restrain trade. Pending is a motion by the National Football League, NFL Properties, the New York Jets Football Club, Inc., and the Miami Dolphins, Ltd. (collectively “the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Spinelli v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- In Re Title Insurance Antitrust CasesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Coalition for Icann Transparency, Inc. v. Verisign, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Coalition for ICANN Transparency Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Smith v. Network Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.