Legal Opinion
Smith v. Network Solutions, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided March 22, 2001No. CV 00-BU-2769-SPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
BUTTRAM, District Judge.
In his third amended complaint in the above-styled action, Plaintiff Stan Smith seeks injunctive relief under section 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 26, on behalf of himself and a putative class based on allegations that Defendants Network Solutions, Inc. (“NSI”) and VeriSign, Inc. ("VeriSign”) have intentionally maintained an unlawful monopoly, in violation of section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2. Now pending before the Court are the following four motions: Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, for dismissal of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Goforit Entertainment, LLC v. Digimedia.Com L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- Coalition for Icann Transparency, Inc. v. Verisign, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Solid Host, NL v. Namecheap, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Coalition for ICANN Transparency Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.