Coalition for ICANN Transparency Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
WHYTE, District Judge.
Defendant VeriSign, Inc. (‘VeriSign”) and defendant Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”) both move to dismiss plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff Coalition For ICANN Transparency, Inc. (“CFIT”) opposes both motions. The court has read the moving and responding papers and considered counsels’ arguments. For the reasons set forth below, the court GRANTS defendants’ motions to dismiss. Plaintiff has twenty (20) days from the date of this order to amend its…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rearden LLC v. Rearden Commerce, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Office Depot, Inc. v. ZuccariniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Panda Herbal International, Inc. v. Luby (In Re Luby)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Goforit Entertainment, LLC v. Digimedia.Com L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Brown v. Interactive Media Entertainment & Gaming Ass'nKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.