Coalition for Icann Transparency, Inc. v. Verisign, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on June 5, 2009 is hereby amended.
The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are otherwise DENIED, and no further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is about whether the plaintiff, Coalition for ICANN Transparency, Inc., using antitrust statutes drafted in the late 19th century, has successfully stated claims in connection with the administration of the Internet domain name system, so essential to the operation of our sophisticated 21st century communications net work. The district court ruled that the plaintiff…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Name.Space, Inc. v. Internet Corp. for Assigned Names & NumbersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.