Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Alko Express Lines v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1942No. Appeal, 285PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The Lancaster Transportation Company, hereinafter called the Lancaster Company, which had been authorized previously to transport property between Lancaster and Philadelphia, applied to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission for a certificate of public convenience to transport property as a common carrier between Lancaster and Pittsburgh and also between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh and vice versa, and certain intermediate points. Alko Express Lines, Clark-Callahan, Inc., Kramer Brothers Freight Lines, Ific., Philadelphia-Pittsburgh Carriers, Inc., and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Moderm Trans. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Hoffman v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Aizen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Holt v. PariserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. In the Interest of D.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Wells v. Pittsburgh Board of Public EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Hostetter v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API