Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Public Service Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1930No. Appeal 94PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Appellants, after taking the necessary preliminary steps to secure a charter, formally applied to the Public Service Commission for the approval of the incorporation of the Universal Cab Company and for a certificate of public convenience authorizing the Universal Cab Company to begin the exercise of the privilege of operating “taxicabs, automobiles and kindred motor vehicles ....... as a common carrier for the transportation of persons and incidental baggage upon call and demand in the City and County of Philadelphia and vicinity.” The Yellow Cab Company, a public…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Perry County Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Garson v. Steamboat Canal Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Jenkins Township v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Furstenberg v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Aizen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Phillips v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Alko Express Lines v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API