Legal Opinion
Moderm Trans. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Com.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 27, 1939PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Argued September 27, 1939. Modern Transfer Company, Inc., by one appeal, and Reading Company and Reading Transportation Company, by another appeal, challenge the validity of an order of the Public Utility Commission "consolidating and coordinating" previous existing certificates of public convenience authorizing the York Motor Express Company (hereafter referred to as York Motor) to transport freight by truck on certain public highways. As each appeal involves the same order and the same facts, they will be considered in one opinion. The order of the commission is attacked on the grounds that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Perry County Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- John Benkart & Sons Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Beaver Valley Service Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
- Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Kulp v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Alko Express Lines v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Garner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.