Legal Opinion

Holt v. Pariser

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1947No. Appeal, 134PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Appellants challenge a judgment upon a verdict in trespass for damages resulting to plaintiff’s automobile in a collision. Their assignments of error complain of the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial and rulings upon objections to evidence. The court below dismissed their motion for judgment n. o. v. because no point for binding instructions had been presented at the trial, and its action is not assigned as error. The assigned rulings on the evidence are not within the scope of appellants’ statement of the questions involved in this appeal, and were not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rowles v. EvanuikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Nark v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Siegel v. Struble Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Stone v. C. I. T. Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Alko Express Lines v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Vincent J. Ricciardi, United States of America v. Stanley M. UngerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. Delmar B. Dennis v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Dennis v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Herr v. ErbSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. McCormick Transportation Co. v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API