Legal Opinion

Wells v. Pittsburgh Board of Public Education

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1977No. Appeal, No. 614 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

Richard Wells (appellant) appeals from the dismissal on preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer of Counts I and II of his class action complaint — said Counts being directed against The Pittsburgh Board of Public Education (Board).1

Preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer admit as true all well and clearly pleaded material factual averments and all inferences fairly deducible therefrom. Yania v. Bigan, 397 Pa. 316, 155 A.2d 343 (1959). Conclusions of law and unjustified inferences are not so admitted. Lerman v. Rudolph, 413 Pa. 555, 198…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robert F. Felte, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Yania v. BiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. LERAMAN v. RudolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. BORDEN v. BALDWINSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Albert AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. 220 Partnership v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Madden v. JeffesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. AshfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. In the Interest of D.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API