Henry v. Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
The issues presented on appeal are 1) did AOG’s customers have sufficient notice of the Commission’s intent to increase AOG’s base cost of gas and line loss and 2) is the Commission’s order increasing the amount of refund owed AOG’s customers a valid order. We hold that the Commission’s notice was insufficient to adequately inform AOG’s customers that an increase in line loss or base cost of gas was to be considered. We further find that the Commission’s order increasing the amount of refund owed AOG’s customers is valid in that AOG waived its right to challenge the order on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Clark Eugene HeffnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Hammond v. LenfestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Frances L. Hall v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Southern Oil Corp. v. Yale Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Simpson v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Public Service Co. v. State Ex Rel. Corporation Commission Ex Rel. LovingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Pollock v. Patuxent Institution Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.