Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Lenfest

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 10, 1968No. 461, Docket 31909PublishedCited by 204 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:

The issue presented by this appeal is of great importance in determining the proper relationship of the federal courts to the military establishment. We are called upon to decide whether an enlisted member of the naval reserve claiming to be a conscientious objector may petition for a writ of habeas corpus to obtain review of the decision of his military superiors denying a discharge requested pursuant to Department of Defense and Navy Regulations.

I

The facts are undisputed and can be stated briefly. On September 30, 1963, appellant Charles A. Hammond, then a…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by204 opinions

  1. Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Clark Eugene HeffnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. Noyd v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. William L. Calley, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, Etc., Etc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Thomas C. Smith, Appellant-Petitioner v. Stanley S. Resor, Secretary of the Army, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API