Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 21, 1993No. 81318PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

In this original proceeding two issues are tendered for our consideration: (1) Is Art. 10, § 7 of the Oklahoma City Charter contrary to the statutory procedure for filing an election protest? and (2) Is protest time for municipal elections controlled by the *178state law that governs the issuance of a certificate of election? We take original cognizance of the case, answer the first question in the negative and the second in the affirmative, and deny the writs, leaving undisturbed the trial judge’s order.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

Petitioner Sheila Simpson was initially determined…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Burdick v. Independent School District No. 52Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Brown v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API