Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Patuxent Institution Board of Review

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 8, 2003No. 106, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATHELL, Judge.

Since 1991 there has been recurring litigation between Michael Pollock, petitioner/cross-respondent (hereafter “petitioner”) and the Patuxent Institution Board of Review, respondent/eross-petitioner (hereafter the “Board”). This is the second time a case between these parties has been before this Court. We granted certiorari in this appeal to decide whether positive urinalysis drug test results of a sample supplied by petitioner should have been excluded from evidence at petitioner’s parole revocation hearing due to the failure of the staff of the Patuxent Institution…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Nader v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Taylor v. Harford County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Charles County Department of Social Services v. VannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API