Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice:
In this original proceeding Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWB) seeks this Court’s order disqualifying Corporation Commissioner Anthony (Anthony) from further participation in Corporation Commission proceeding PUD-260, a rate hearing, as well as in all pending and future SWB cases. SWB asserts that Anthony is biased and prejudiced against it, and his continued participation in eases where its substantive rights are at issue will deny SWB its right to due process of law because it will not be able to receive a fair hearing from an impartial tribunal.
I
The focus of SWB’s…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Keating v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Johnson v. Tony's Town Mister QuikSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DobbsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Crussel v. KirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.