Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
T 1 The dispositive questions presented for review are: (1) Did the Corporation Commission err in treating this proceeding as legislative rather than judicial? and (2) Is the order under review sustained by law and by substantial evidence? We answer the first question in the negative and the second in the affirmative.
I
ANATOMY OF THE PROCEEDINGS
T2 Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. d/b/a SBC Oklahoma ("SBC" or "SBC Oklahoma")2 is an Incumbent Local Exchange Company (ILEC) 3 that provides telecommunications services in Oklahoma. It is regulated by the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (the…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Glover v. CornishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- City of Midwest City v. House of Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Dobson Telephone Company v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- CRAWFORD v. OSU MEDICAL TRUSTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.