Legal Opinion

Vernon v. Omark Industries

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1989No. 17312PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

The Industrial Commission denied Vernon’s claim for worker’s compensation benefits, ruling that she had not proved that her injury arose out of and in the course of her employment. On appeal this Court vacated and remanded the case back to the commission, instructing it to “make more detailed factual findings and conclusions of law to support its ultimate holding.” Vernon v. Omark Industries, 113 Idaho 358, 361, 744 P.2d 86, 89 (1987) (Vernon I). On remand, the commission made new findings of fact and conclusions of law and again concluded that claimant failed to sustain her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wynn v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Neufeld v. Browning Ferris IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hazen v. General StoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Johnson v. Bennett Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Blackwell v. Omark IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Darner v. Southeast Idaho In-Home ServicesIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Nelson v. Ponsness-Warren Idgas EnterprisesIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Dolph v. Hecla Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Darner v. Southeast Idaho In-Home ServicesIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API