Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Bennett Lumber Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1988No. 16523PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Claimant Johnson appeals from an Industrial Commission order denying her worker’s compensation benefits because the commission found that her low back problems were not caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment with Bennett Lumber Company. Because there is substantial competent evidence to sustain the commission’s findings, we affirm.

I

Johnson’s notice of injury and claim for benefits, filed with the Industrial Commission, alleged that she sustained an industrial accident and injury on February 20, 1985. At the hearing before the commission the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houser v. Southern Idaho Pipe & Steel, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Neufeld v. Browning Ferris IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hazen v. General StoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Lopez v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Blackwell v. Omark IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Nelson v. Ponsness-Warren Idgas EnterprisesIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Stolle v. BennettIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Vernon v. Omark IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Roberts v. Asgrow Seed Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API