Legal Opinion

Hazen v. General Store

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1986No. 15768PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

The basic tenet of appellate review is that on appeal the record is to be construed most favorably to the party which prevailed below.1 Higginson v. Westergard, 100 Idaho 687, 689, 604 P.2d 51, 53 (1979); Furness v. Park, 98 Idaho 617, 570 P.2d 854 (1977); Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irr. Dist., 97 Idaho 580, 585, 548 P.2d 80, 85 (1976).

Viewing the record most favorably to the respondent, which the foregoing cases have uniformly held that we must do, the record reflects the following. Appellant, who was 61 years old at the time, had been working several months for her employer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Wynn v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Furness v. ParkIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Garrett Freightlines, Inc. v. Bannock Paving Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Dallas Clark v. Shari's Management CorpIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Stevens-McAtee v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Nelson v. Ponsness-Warren Idgas EnterprisesIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Brooks v. Standard Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API