Legal Opinion

Wynn v. J.R. Simplot Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1983No. 14168PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission denying a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits. We reverse. The sole question presented is whether, as held by the Commission, the claimant failed to establish that his condition was caused by an “accident,” i.e., a distinct mishap or event.

At a precise time on a precise day, i.e., 7:30 p.m. on March 17,1980, claimant-appellant Wynn suffered a “documented left C-3-4, soft disc herniation,” which the uncontroverted testimony of his attending physician indicated occurred “while he was working his front end…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Beaver v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Pinson Ex Rel. Pinson v. Minidoka Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In Re LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Neufeld v. Browning Ferris IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Swanson v. Kraft, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hazen v. General StoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Horton v. Garrett Freightlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API