Legal Opinion

Blackwell v. Omark Industries

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1988No. 16786PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Appellant Blackwell appeals from a decision of the Industrial Commission denying his claim for worker’s compensation benefits. The Industrial Commission, after conducting a hearing, found that (1) Blackwell failed to prove that he incurred an industrial accident and injury as alleged in his application for hearing; and (2) Blackwell did not give notice of injury to the employer within sixty days as required by I.C. § 72-701, nor did the employer have actual knowledge of any injury to Blackwell. We affirm the commission’s decision.

Claimant Blackwell was employed full time by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wynn v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hazen v. General StoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Nelson v. PumneaIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Snyder v. Burl C. Lange, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Johnson v. Bennett Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Vernon v. Omark IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Roberts v. Asgrow Seed Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API