Legal Opinion
Darner v. Southeast Idaho In-Home Services
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 1992No. 19160Published
1Opinion of the Court
841 P.2d 427 (1992)
122 Idaho 897
Darlene D. DARNER, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
SOUTHEAST IDAHO IN-HOME SERVICES, employer, and State Insurance Fund, surety, employer, and State of Idaho Industrial Special Indemnity Fund, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 19160.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Idaho Falls, May 1992 Term.
November 4, 1992.
Lyon & Jorgensen, Pocatello, for claimant-appellant. Kenneth E. Lyon, Jr., argued.
Steven R. Fuller, Preston, for respondents Southeast Idaho In-Home Services and State Ins. Fund.
McDevitt, Meyers & Thomsen, Pocatello, for respondent State Industrial Sp. Indem. Fund, Jerry R. Meyers,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Neufeld v. Browning Ferris IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Mundy v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. SimesIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Nelson v. PumneaIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Olvera v. Del's Auto BodyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.