Legal Opinion

Dolph v. Hecla Mining Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1991No. 18606PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a workers' compensation case. The only issue presented is whether there was substantial competent evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s finding that the claimant did not sustain an accident while at work which caused an injury. We hold that there was sufficient evidence to support the Commission’s finding.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.

Jerry Dolph was employed as a miner by Hecla Mining Company. On a Monday morning, Dolph informed Hecla that he had injured his knee at work the previous Friday and had to see a doctor. Dolph visited a doctor the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vernon v. Omark IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Darner v. Southeast Idaho In-Home ServicesIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Konvalinka v. Bonneville CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Ross v. Tupperware Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Darner v. Southeast Idaho In-Home ServicesIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dolph v. Hecla Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API